ON THE LEGAL REGULATION OF ECONOMIC RELATIONS IN RUSSIA DURING THE MARKET ECONOMY TRANSITION (1990–1993)

Authors

  • Artur Azamatovich Abazov Baltachevsky Interdistrict Investigative Department of the Office of Criminal Investigations of the Investigative Committee, Russian Federation, Republic of Bashkortostan
  • Azat Bulatovich Galimkhanov Ufa University of Science and Technologies
  • Yusupov Rakhimyan Galimyanovich Ufa University of Science and Technologies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33184/vest-law-bsu-2024.23.2

Keywords:

property right, economic system, socio-economic relations, organisational and economic relations, privatisation of state and municipal property

Abstract

The transition of the socialist-style economic system to a market economy is a complex process that required the formation of a new tax system, market infrastructure, pricing principles and so on. At the heart of economic reform is the distribution of ownership of the means of production, that determines the model of the economic system and the nature of economic relations. This article is devoted to this issue. It studies the relevant normative legal acts of the RSFSR and the Russian Federation for 1990–1993 and analyses the dynamics of establishing the limits of public (state and municipal) and private property rights. It was established that in the initial stage of the reform, legal acts
enshrined equality of all forms of property and carefully solved the problem of state monopolism. But then, in two stages, but in a short time, instead of equal rights for all forms of ownership at the legal level, the bias towards private property has been consolidated, even in a number of strategic and social spheres. Special attention is paid to the legislative establishment of foreign individuals’ and legal
entities’ right to conduct business activities in Russia, to acquire ownership of strategic property and resources, and to provide banking support for privatisation transactions. It is concluded that in the period under study the essence of
transformations was not only to eradicate the legacy of the command economic system, but also to subordinate the Russian economy to external players. From two types of economic relations, only organisational and economic developed adequately. But they did not work to the benefit of the state and society, which unbalanced the entire economic system and resulted in a deep economic crisis.

Author Biographies

Artur Azamatovich Abazov, Baltachevsky Interdistrict Investigative Department of the Office of Criminal Investigations of the Investigative Committee, Russian Federation, Republic of Bashkortostan

Lead Investigator of the Investigative Department

Azat Bulatovich Galimkhanov , Ufa University of Science and Technologies

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor, Assistant Professor of the Chair of Criminalistics, Institute of Law

Yusupov Rakhimyan Galimyanovich, Ufa University of Science and Technologies

Doctor of Sciences (History), Professor of the Chair of Theory of State and Law, Institute of Law

References

Ткаченко А.А. Сущность и виды социально-экономических отношений / А.А. Ткаченко // Концепт. – 2016. – № S17. – С. 42–46.

Левина М.И. Исследование экономических систем и их классификация / М.И. Левина // Экономика. Право. Инновации. – 2019. – № 2. – С. 6–13.

Ханин Г.И. Коммерческие банки РФ в 1992–1998 годы / Г.И. Ханин // Идеи и идеалы. – 2011. – Т. 1, № 3 (9). – С. 109–128.

Груздева О.А. История экономики России : курс лекций / О.А. Груздева. – Москва : МИСиС, 2012. – 160 с.

Мусаелян Л.А. Реформы 90-х и их экономические и политико-правовые последствия / Л.А. Мусаелян // Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: Юридические науки. – 2018. – Вып. 39. – С. 36–52.

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

[1]
Абазов , А.А. , Галимханов , А.Б. and Юсупов , Р.Г. 2024. ON THE LEGAL REGULATION OF ECONOMIC RELATIONS IN RUSSIA DURING THE MARKET ECONOMY TRANSITION (1990–1993). Bulletin of the Institute of Law of the Bashkir State University. 7, 3(23) (Sep. 2024), 20–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33184/vest-law-bsu-2024.23.2.

Issue

Section

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW; CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROCEEDING; MUNICIPAL LAW